The Document You Need to Read

If you have not read the MANHATTAN DECLARATION, I strongly urge you to do so. It is posted on the internet and easy to find.

Whether you are a person of deep faith, a nominal Christian, or a non-believer who has strong concerns for the wellbeing of society, you will find this document relevant. It pinpoints the three key areas where cultural battles are now mounting whose outcomes will profoundly affect all of North America.

As background, the MANHATTAN DECLARATION is a moving document released to the world on November 20, 2009. It was drafted by the late Charles Colson along with a professor from Princeton and another from the Beeson Divinity School in California. It is written with goodwill toward all, and reflects strong civic concern and moral earnestness.

More than 100 Catholic, Evangelical and Orthodox leaders — persons of stature in each of those spheres of influence — first signed it. To date it has also been signed by 529,000 individuals throughout the United States and beyond.

The primary value of this Declaration is that it pinpoints the three fundamental issues over which western society – the culture we all live and breathe in – is locked in combat. They are:

(1) The sanctity of human life; (2) The dignity of marriage; and (3) Religious liberty.

In (1) the issue is more widespread and complex than the destruction of pre-born infants. For example, the declaration states, “… in our nation today the lives of the unborn, the disabled and the elderly are severely threatened.”

As well, the life issue includes eugenics, cloning, the abortion-causing drug, RU-486, partial birth abortion, embryonic stem-cell experimentation, semantic gymnastics (the torturing of language so as to make wrong appear to be right) and so-called death panels that decide what medical treatments may, and may not, be allowed for human diseases of the elderly.

In case (2) the declaration speaks cogently in defense of marriage. It asserts, “Vast human experience confirms that marriage is the original and most important institution for sustaining the health, education and welfare of all persons in society.”

Yet for sixty years or so this institution, fundamental to society’s health, has been under attack. Consider the increase in divorce statistics since World War II, laws providing for no-fault divorce, the drift toward living-together-unmarried, the rising call to legalize same-sex marriage, and the growing numbers of children who grow up without one parent or the other – all these contributing to the denigration and perilous crumbling of traditional marriage.

Here is the question often asked by those who crusade for same sex marriage: How can our gay marriage do damage to those of you in traditional marriages? The Declaration answers: it hurts by breaking down marriage boundaries – boundaries that make marriage unique. The first step will lead logically to opening of doors to other anomalies, such as polygamy, incestuous unions, pedophilic marriages, etc.

“No one,” the Declaration contends, “has a civil right to have a non-marital relationship treated as a marriage (defined as one man and one woman).”

Case (3) is the attack on religious liberty. As I write, the TV channels continue to revisit the Chick-fil-A eruption of this past two weeks: a founder of a successful business that has 1600 outlets in 37 states and does more than four billion dollars of business each year states his opposition on principle to gay marriage. He cites the Bible. His statement is personal, and the outlets are operated on the highest principles of civility and law. Yet mayors of three major cities, Boston, Chicago and San Francisco, publicly stated upon hearing this that their cities would not welcome the man’s business outlets. The comments of one even sounded threatening.

So, in what ways could the careful reading of the MANHATTAN DECLARATION be helpful to you, whether in Canada or the United States? For one thing, it could help pin down clearly the issues at the center of the cultural wars now coming into the open.

For another, it could help you understand and master the reasoning behind the issues so you could speak clearly when discussions develop. For yet another, by pondering the Declaration you would become more motivated to participate in the debate as it repeatedly surfaces.

Perhaps most importantly it would make you feel a part of the more than one-half million signers rather than merely a lone person whose participation in this colossal struggle would count for nothing.

Bookmark and Share

2 thoughts on “The Document You Need to Read

  1. Hello Bishop Bastian!

    I am an evangelical Christian. I am responding because I think the “slippery slope” arguments against gay marriage just aren’t sustainable, nor are they necessarily true. I am not advocating for gay marriage, just to say that this line of argument is often argumentative fallacy.

    There have been gay couples living together for decades. Whole community of gay folks living life together and there has been no more escalation of sexual deviance than what is already inherent in the definition of the community.

    I am all for the protection of life, but why doesn’t this include universal healthcare? If life is so precious that it needs our ultimate protection, why should we Christians (in the USA) not desire healthcare and reject such fear mongering as death panels. I believe you live in Canada, how do you like your health care system? Also, why do we send our young men and women into war? Why is there so much homelessness? Poverty? Certainly these lives are precious too, right?

    Chik-Fil-A is not an example of an attack on religious liberty. The mayors were wrong to say what they said, but it should be no surprise that there are people who are for and against gay marriage in our culture who are going to fight back and forth. Also, this case is not simply a matter of free speech. The Cathy’s and CFA donate thousands to political causes and politicians. A percentage of our patronage goes to political causes. Some people don’t want to support those causes and so they boycott. But not every cultural battle is persecution and/or attack on religious liberty. The world is supposed to always hate us this side of the eschaton.

    As a pastor, did you ever marry a couple who was cohabitating before their wedding? Have you ever gone to a wedding of a couple who did cohabitate? Did you serve communion to divorced and remarried people? I am not implying that the church’s acceptance of these sexual sins should move us to side with gay marriage, just trying to convey the profoundly difficult place Christians find themselves. “Gay marriage will lead to pedophilia” just doesn’t seem helpful.

    • The “death panels” you speak of and which Sarah Palin coined to characterize those bureaucrats who determine whether you will get care or not, what drugs will be available for you at what age, and what quality of life issues will determine the quality of care you receive simply highlight the fact that health care is more a political thing than it is a real thing. If you look at socialized medicine in the United Kingdom and Canada, there is rationing. There is waiting. There is dying because of the illusion that care will be more affordable, better provided, More universal. Obama Care consists of eugenics, social engineering and mandates that militate against conscience and are therefore wrong. The smoke and mirrors presented by the current government gives the illusion of care without providing the substance of care. Political parties all have “wedge issues” that define political campaigns and universal health care is one of those issues.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s