About Companionship in Marriage

He’s nearly a hundred years old and he has a girlfriend. They don’t go on trips together; they don’t smooch; but they meet regularly to enjoy each other’s company. It’s definitely a mellowed version of the male/female attraction God has built into all of us.

And it’s not uncommon. I recall seeing this attraction in another elderly couple several years ago. Each had earlier lost a life’s mate. They were both frail, but they held hands as they walked together, and they smiled easily at one another. No marriage was in the offing, but the charm of it all warmed the hearts of their friends.

It’s an amazing magnetism. The deepest bond between the sexes, the bond that can sustain a relationship through all of life’s seasons, lasting a lifetime, is a companionship bond. It is deeper and even more enduring than the sexual bond that seals the union — as binding as that bond is.

This companionship aspect isn’t always fully perceived by us when we are young. We are keenly aware of the sexual energies with which God has endowed us, and these are a compelling reality. But, is there more? Genesis 2 closes the story of Adam and Eve, with this editorial word: “… a man will leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and they will become one flesh” (Gen. 2:24).

“One flesh” in this case implies more than sexual union, even though sexual union is included. At the outset of the story God gives his reason for providing Adam a suitable helper: “It is not good for the man to be alone” (Gen. 2:18). The sexual differentiation (male/female) God was promising in that moment was first for companionship. It was to be a heaven-sent antidote to Adam’s loneliness.

This provision must surely be a major reason the Scriptures forbid the marriage of believers to unbelievers. “Do not be yoked together with unbelievers,” Paul wrote the Corinthian Christians (2 Cor. 6:14). He asks, “What does a believer have in common with an unbeliever?” (2 Cor. 6:15b). The Scriptures always call us to loyalty to the Lord first. But, for those who marry, they also call us to companionship in the Lord.

Who of us has not seen a young wife sit alone in church Sunday after Sunday. Her husband is off fishing or riding his motorcycle or at home reading his sports magazines. Romance may have drawn them together, a lavish wedding may have been celebrated, but the spiritual union a marriage should provide is missing.

On the other hand, who of us has not known a couple whose shared love for the Lord enhanced every other aspect of their love. I recall a young couple I sat with at their dining room table as I led the husband to faith in Jesus. Days later his wife told me, “I loved him before but now I love him so much I could hug him to pieces.” The missing strand, a union in Christ, had been added.

Christian young people anticipating marriage should often be reminded of this: One of the greatest testimonies the church can give to a secular world — a world in which too many marriages suffer from weak or defective bonds — is the presence of radiant Christian married couples. They should be couples of all ages who show by their joy in one another the riches of a companionship rooted in a shared love for Christ. Didn’t Jesus say to his disciples, “You are the light of the world”?

To e-mail this post to a friend click here.

Bookmark and Share

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “About Companionship in Marriage

  1. I identify with what you’re writing here. My husband and I have been married for 51 years now. …and I’m happy to say we have a Christian marriage. My parents were married for 72 years! They were a very good example for us.

  2. Amen, Don!

    Muriel and I were married 37 1/2 years when cancer took her.
    Now Yvonne and I have celebrated our 22nd anniversary. Both of us would have liked to have the continuation of the first marriages, but now we are enjoying the solid delight of companionship after 80. It is something very special. How thankful I am for a loving, caring companion who is committed to God and His ministry as I. What more could I ask for at this time in life?
    BobMcD

  3. Dear Pastor,

    This comment is so late that it may go unnoticed, but I want to thank you for this paper. Since my wife died I have been writing small papers, mostly for myself. I had been advised to keep a journal but found that I could not do it. I could only write when thoughts came to me. I had almost completed a paper about companionship. I searched the Internet and found very little about companionship. Then I discovered your article. Many of the points made are an exact parallel to my understanding.

    Early in 2010 I developed a companionship with a long-time friend who had just lost her husband. My wife had died in 2005 and I reached out to her to help her through a difficult time. We ended up helping each other. We bonded very rapidly. Our relationship is very similar to the two examples you gave. The main difference is that our companionship developed by telephone. I live near Savannah while she lives near Seattle. We have managed to visit each other but that was long after we became companions.

    When my wife died suddenly after 40 years of a great marriage I was not prepared. I felt a huge void. It took me a long time to realize that the void was not due to any loss of love. It was that sudden total loss of companionship! Why did none of the articles about healing point out this simple fact? It should be obvious that a replacement of even a small amount of the lost companionship would be important in healing. A proper diagnosis should be the first step in any healing.

    Thanks again

    Roy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s